Каждый раз, когда на своих лекциях и семинарах я заговаривал на тему интеллектуальной продуктивности, участники (за исключением, разумеется, руководителей высшего звена) начинали жаловаться на офисы открытого типа, в которых им приходилось работать. Получалось, что такие офисы больше всего мешали умственной работе.
Это побудило меня глубоко заняться изучением условий труда интеллектуальных работников. Результаты моих изысканий подтвердили обоснованность их жалоб: подавляющее большинство офисов открытого типа абсолютно непригодны для умственного труда — потому что сосредоточенное размышление здесь дается с трудом и зачастую невозможно.
В этой книге я хотел обратиться только к тем проблемам, которые вы можете решить сами или в сотрудничестве с единомышленниками. К сожалению, от таких контрпродуктивных офисов вы не сможете избавиться сами: этот вопрос находится вне контроля большинства работников умственного труда. Вряд ли вы можете что-либо сделать с этим — разве что объединиться с коллегами и поднять восстание.
Однако жалобы и результаты исследований были настолько убедительными, что я счел непозволительным оставлять эту проблему за рамками своей книги. Я не стал посвящать этой теме полноценную главу и ограничился лишь краткими резюме. Однако я написал и отдельную брошюру «Мозгоповреждающие офисы открытого типа: Оковы для мозга № 5» — она доступна для бесплатного скачивания на моем сайте www.brainchains.org. Вы можете распространять эту брошюру целиком и любые ее части — так вы повысите осведомленность людей о контрпродуктивности офисов открытого типа и совместными усилиями добьетесь улучшения своих условий труда. Брошюра не защищена авторским правом, вам просто нужно указывать источник «Brain Hostile Open Offices. The Fifth BrainChain». Theo Compernolle. www.brainchains.org.
Предупреждение! Теперь дело за вами: «просто» — не всегда означает «легко»
«Просто читать» и «просто понять» — не значит «легко применять». Иногда самый простой совет исполнить труднее всего. Но если вы на практике примените все те знания и идеи, которые вы узнали в этой книге, я гарантирую — результаты ошеломят вас. А если вы прекратите использовать телефон и любые другие ИКТ во время вождения, это может спасти жизнь и здоровье людям. В том числе и вам самим.
Если у вас есть вопросы, предложения, идеи, истории из жизни, рекомендации и решения, пожалуйста, напишите мне их на форуме на моем сайте www.BrainChains.org или на мою почту theo@BrainChains.org.
Я желаю вам успехов в повышении вашей интеллектуальной продуктивности и, как следствие, больше счастья и радости на работе и дома.
Удачи вам!
Тео Компернолле
ПримечаниЯ
Предисловие
Arthur Schopenhauer: On Noise. 1851, translation by T. Bailey Saunders. http://www.noisehelp.com/schopenhauer-quotes.html. Смотрите также http://www.schopenhauervereinigung.com/articles/arthur-schopenhauer-on-noise/
The Brain’s Last Stand. Stephen Levvy. May 1997, Newsweek. http://www.academicchess.org/Focus/Deep-Blue/newsbrain.shtml
The Chess Master and the Computer. Garry Kasparov. The New York Review of Books. February 11, 2010. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/feb/11/the-chess-masterand-the-computer/
The Chess Master and the Computer. Garry Kasparov. The New York Review of Books. February 11, 2010. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/feb/11/the-chess-masterand-the-computer/
“After Setbacks, Online Courses Are Rethought”, Online CoNew York Times. December 10, 2013.
“Over bevlogen, enthousiasmerend en inspirerend onderwijs”. Theo Compernolle in “Van jongemensen, de dingen die gaan en komen” Theo Doreleijers. 2013. Uitg. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Targeting Glia Cells: Novel Perspectives for the Treatment of Neuro-psychiatric Diseases. B. Di Benedetto and R. Rupprecht; Current Neuropharmacology, 2013, 11, 2.
Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task. Ning-long Xu, Mark T. Harnett, Stephen R. Williams, Daniel Huber, Daniel H. O’Connor, Rarel Svoboda & Jeffrey C. Magee; Nature 492. 247–251 (13 December 2012).
Dendrites. Yuh-Nung Jan and Lily Yeh Jan. Genes & Dev. 2001. 15: 2627–2641.
Dendritic computation. Michael London and Michael Häusser. Annual Review of Neuroscience. Vol. 28: 503–532.
Active dendrites: colorful wings of the mysterious butterflies, Daniel Johnston, Rishikesh Narayanan, Trends in Neurosciences. Volume 31. Issue 6. June 2008, pp. 309–316.
Dendritic spikes enhance stimulus selectivity in cortical neurons in vivo. Spencer L. Smith, Ikuko T. Smith, Tiago Branco & Michael Häusser. Nature. Letter 27 October 2013.
Orientation and Direction Selectivity of Synaptic Inputs in Visual Cortical Neurons: A Diversity of Combinations Produces Spike Tuning, Cyril Monier, Frédéric Chavane, Pierre Baudot, Lyle J. Graham, Yves Frégnac, Neuron. Volume 37, Issue 4. February 20 2003, pp. 663–680.
Wave Propagation Along Spiny Dendrites. Paul C. BressloffWaves. Neural Media. Lecture Notes on Mathematical Modelling in the Life Sciences 2014, pp. 101–136.
Machine, heal thyself, Build yourself a brain, Paul Marks, New Scientist. February 16, 2013.
Paul Marks, Computer that heals itself uses nature’s randomness to work. New Scientist, Volume 217, Issue 2904, 16 February 2013, p. 21.
SpiNNaker: A 1-W 18-Core System-on-Chip for Massively-Parallel Neural Network Simulation. S.B. Painkras, E.; Plana, L.A.; Garside, J.; Temple, S.;Galluppi, F.; Patterson, C.; Lester, D.R.; Brown, A.D.; Furber, Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, Issue Date: Aug. 2013, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=6515159.
Power analysis of large-scale, real-time neural networks on SpiNNaker. Evangelos Stromatias, Francesco Galluppi, Cameron Patterson and Steve Furber. 2013. neuromorphs.net. https://www.neuromorphs.net/nm/
Improving the Interconnection Network of a Brain Simulator. Jonathan Heathcote. 2013 http://jhnet.co.uk/misc/phdFirstYearReport.pdf
SpiNN aker: A 1-W 18-Core System-on-Chip for Massively-Parallel Neural Network Simulation. Painkras, E.; Plana, L.A.; Garside, J.; Temple, S.; Galluppi, F.; Patterson, C.; Lester, D.R.; Brown, A.D.; Furber, S.B. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, Issue Date: Aug. 2013.
Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ajay Bhaskar Satpute, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Volume 23, Issue 3, June 2013, pp. 361–372.
A functional architecture of the human brain: emerging insights from the science of emotion. K.A. Lindquist, T.D. Wager, H. Kober, E. Bliss-Moreau, L.F. Barrett. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, November 2012, Vol. 16, № 11 533.
Clarify Brain Affective Processing Without Necessarily Clarifying Emotions.
Peter Walla and Jaak Panksepp. Novel Frontiers of Advanced Neuroimaging 2013. Chapter 6.
Dynamics of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Humans, Kirsty L. Spalding, Olaf Bergmann, Kanar Alkass, Samuel Bernard, Mehran Salehpour, Hagen B. Huttner, Emil Boström, Isabelle Westerlund, Celine Vial, Bruce A. Buchholz, Göran Possnert, Deborah C. Mash, Henrik Druid, Jonas Frisén, Cell, Volume 153, Issue 6, 6 June 2013, pp. 1219–1227.
Превосходный обзор нынешнего положения дел и последних открытий в этой области смотрите в недавнем выпуске (№ 80) журнала Neuroimage от 15 октября 2013 года, статья “Mapping the Connectome”.
Introduction to the NeuroImage Special Issue “Mapping the Connectome”, Steve Smith, NeuroImage, Volume 80, 15 October 2013, p. 1.
Functional interactions between intrinsic brain activity and behavior, Sepideh Sadaghiani, Andreas Kleinschmidt, NeuroImage, Volume 80, 15 October 2013, pp. 379–386.
What we can and cannot tell about the wiring of the human brain, Richard E. Passingham, NeuroImage, Volume 80, 15 October 2013, pp. 14–17.
Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior, Deanna M. Barch, and many others, NeuroImage, Volume 80, 15 October 2013, pp. 169–189.
Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations, Deanna M. Barch, and many others, NeuroImage, Volume 80, 15 October 2013, pp. 360–378.
Здесь можно найти прекрасный обзор: Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Jonathan St. B. T. Evans. Annual Review of Psychology. 2007/2008 Vol. 59: 255–278. An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. MAGDA OSMAN. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Volume 11, Number 6 (2004), 988–1010 2004. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/
handle/123456789/151/Evaluation%20of%20dual
%20process%20theories.pdf?sequence=8
Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Goel, V. and Dolan, R.J. (2003) Cognition 87, B11–B22.
Stress: Vriend en Vijand. T. Compernolle Uitgeverij Lannoo Belgium. 2012. 14th edition. Четвертое обновленное издание на английском языке «Stress: Friend and Foe» выпущено в начале 2015 г. Некоторые материалы доступны на сайте www.brainchains.com.
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
Thinking fast and slow. Daniel Kahneman. Penguin Books. 2012. (Канеман Д. Думай медленно, решай быстро. — М.: АСТ, 2013.)
Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, H. (2014). The Myth of Cognitive Decline: Non-Linear Dynamics of Lifelong Learning. Topics in cognitive science.
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Fox M.D., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D.C., Raichle M.E. . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5; 102(27): 9673–8.
Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Greicius M.D., Krasnow B., Reiss A.L., Menon V. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan. 7; 100(1): 253–8. Default network connectivity during a working memory task. Bluhm R.L. , Clark C.R., McFarlane A.C., Moores K.A., Shaw M.E. , Lanius R.A. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Jul.; 32(7): 1029–35. Epub 2010 Jul. 20.
Individual Differences and the Belief Bias Effect: Mental Models, Logical Necessity, and Abstract Reasoning. Donna Torrens. Thinking & Reasoning. Volume 5, Issue 1, 1999. pp. 1–28.
More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning. Henry Markovits, Hugues Lortie Forgues and Marie-Laurence Brunet. MEMORY & COGNITION. Volume 40, Number 5 (2012), 736–747.
General intellectual ability. Mithen, Steven. In Steven W. Gangestad & Jeffrey A. Simpson (eds.), The Evolution of Mind: Fundamental Questions and Controversies. 2006a. pp. 319–324. New York: The Guilford Press.
Divided Representation of Concurrent Goals in the Human Frontal Lobes. Sylvain Charron, Etienne Koechlin. Science 16 April 2010: Vol. 328 no. 5976, pp. 360–363. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5976/360/F3.expansion.html.
Control of Attention Shifts between Vision and Audition in Human Cortex. Sarah Shomstein and Steven Yantis. The Journal of Neuroscience, November 24, 2004. 24(47): 10702–10706.
Visual attention is a single, integrated resource. Alexander Pastukhov, Laura Fischer, Jochen Braun. Vision. Research. Volume 49, Issue 10, 2 June 2009, pp. 1166–1173.
Divided Representation of Concurrent Goals in the Human Frontal Lobes. Sylvain Charron, Etienne Koechlin. Science 16 April 2010: Vol. 328 no. 5976, pp. 360–363. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5976/360/F3.expansion.html
Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? By Levy, Jonathan; Pashler, Harold. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 27(4), Aug. 2001, 862–869.
Рене Маруа, нейробиолог из Университета Вандербилта. Цит. по: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126018694.
Understanding email interaction increases organizational productivity. T. Jackson. Ray Dawson. Darren Wilson. Communications of the ACM — Program compaction CACM Volume 46 Issue 8, Aug. 2003. pp. 80–84. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.5.8860&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Rogers and Monsell 1995, Rubinstein and Сo 2001.
A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic mechanisms. Meyer, David E.; Kieras, David E. Psychological Review, Vol. 104(1), Jan. 1997, 3–65.
Juggling on a high wire: Multitasking effects on performance. Rachel F. Adlera, Raquel Benbunan-Fich. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Volume 70, Issue 2, Febuary 2012, pp. 156–168.
Investigating the effects of computer mediated interruptions: An analysis of task characteristics and interruption frequency on financial performance. K. Asli Basoglu, Mark A. Fuller,John T. Sweeney. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2009, pp. 177–189.
Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E. & Evans, J. E. (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797.
Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Glenn Wylie, Alan Allport. Psychological Research. Aug. 2000, Volume 63, Issue 3–4, pp. 212–233.
An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Altmann, Erik M.; Gray, Wayne D. Psychological Review, Vol. 115(3), Jul. 2008, 602–639.
The cost of a voluntary task switch, C.M. Arrington, G. Logan, Psychological Science September 2004 vol. 15 no. 9, 610–615.
The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. M.J. Emerson, Akira Miyake, Journal of Memory and Language, 2003. 48(1): 148.
The effects of attentional load on saccadic task switching, Jason L. Chan, Joseph F. X. DeSouza, Experimental Brain Research, June 2013, Volume 227, Issue 3, pp. 301–309.
Burnout and impaired cognitive functioning: The role of executive control in the performance of cognitive tasks, Stefan Diestela, Marlen Cosmar & Klaus-Helmut Schmidt. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations. Volume 27, Issue 2, 2013, pp. 164–180.
Self-interruptions in discretionary multitasking, Rachel F. Adler, Raquel Benbunan-Fich, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 29, Issue 4, Jul 2013, pp. 1441–1449.
MRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains, Anthony I. Jack, Abigail J. Dawson, Katelyn L. Begany, Regina L. Leckie, Kevin P. Barry, Angela H. Ciccia, Abraham Z. Snyder, NeuroImage, Volume 66, 1 February 2013, pp. 385–401.
Voluntary Task Switching: Chasing the Elusive Homunculus. Arrington, Catherine M.; Logan, Gordon D. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol 31(4), Jul 2005, pp. 683–702.
Understanding email interaction increases organizational productivity. T. Jackson. Ray Dawson. Darren Wilson. Communications of the ACM – Program compaction CACM Volume 46 Issue 8, Aug. 2003. pp. 80–84. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.5.8860&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Allport, Styles, & Hsieh, 1994; Meiran, 1996; Rogers & Monsell, 1995 Juggling on a high wire: Multitasking effects on performance. Rachel F. Adlera, Raquel Benbunan-Fich. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Volume 70, Issue 2, February 2012, pp. 156–168.
Florian Waszak, Bernhard Hommel, Alan Allport, Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulusm priming: Role of episodicn costs, Cognitive Psychology, Volume 46, Issue 4, June 2003, pp. 361–413, Task switching, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Stephen Monsell, Volume 7, Issue 3, March 2003, pp. 134–140, http://matt.colorado.edu/teaching/highcog/fall8/m3.pdf
Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. Allport, Alan; Wylie, Glenn Humphreys, Glyn W. (Ed); Duncan, John (Ed); Treisman, Anne (Ed), (1999). Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience, pp. 273–296.
Task-Set Inertia, Attitude Accessibility,and Compatibility-Order Effects: New Evidence for a Task-Set Switching Account of the Implicit Association Test Effect. Karl Christoph Klauer Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bulletin, February 2005 vol. 31, № 2, pp. 208–217.
Inhibition, interference, and conflict in task switching, Russell E. Costa, Frances J. Friedrich, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2012, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp. 1193–1201.
Neural substrates of cognitive switching and inhibition in a face processing task, Camille Piguet, Virginie Sterpenich, Martin Desseilles, Yann Cojan, Gilles Bertschy, Patrik Vuilleumier, NeuroImage, Volume 82, 15 November 2013, pp. 489–499.
The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Iring Koch, Miriam Gade, Stefanie Schuch, Andrea M. Philipp, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2010, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp. 1–14. http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/871/art%253A10.3758%252FPBR.17.1.1.pdf?auth66=1382011321_165db4d3f17d4383dce8638d6be473c5&ext=.pdf
Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval. Doug Rohrer, Harold E. Pashler. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. March 2003, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 96–103.
Divided Representation of Concurrent Goals in the Human Frontal Lobes. Sylvain Charron,Etienne Koechlin. Science, 16 April 2010: Vol. 328 no. 5976, pp. 360–363.
Mayr, U. & Kliegl, R. (2000); Oulasvirta, A and Saariluoma, P. The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Helene Hembrooke and Geri Gay.Journal of Computing in Higher Education. Volume 15, Number 1. 2003.
Strategic modulation of response inhibition in task-switching. Kai Robin Grzyb and Ronald Hübner. Front Psychol. 2013; 4: 545. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM C3749430/
The effects of attentional load on saccadic task switching. Jason L. Chan, Joseph F. X. DeSouza. Experimental Brain Research. Июнь 2013, Volume 227, Issue 3, pp. 301–309.
The effects of attentional load on saccadic task switching. Jason L. Chan, Joseph F. X. DeSouza. Experimental Brain Research. June 2013, Volume 227, Issue 3, pp. 301–309.
Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Karin Foerde, Barbara J. Knowlton, and Russell A. Poldrack. PNAS . PNAS, 1 Aug. 2006, vol. 103 no. 31, pp. 11778–11783.
Enhanced Media Multitasking: The restorative cognitive effects of temporarily escaping the multitasking mindset. Jordan McCarthy. Thesis submission for the degree of master of arts in Communication. Stanford University. 7 June, 2013.
fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains, Anthony I. Jack, Abigail J. Dawson, Katelyn L. Begany, Regina L. Leckie, Kevin P. Barry, Angela H. Ciccia, Abraham Z. Snyder, NeuroImage, Volume 66, 1 February 2013, pp. 385–401.
Are women better than men at multi-tasking? Gijsbert Stoet, Daryl B. O’Connor, Mark Conner, Keith R. Laws, BMC Psychology. October 2013, 1:18.
Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability. Mäntylä, T (2013). Psychological Science, 24, pp. 514–520.
Multitasking. Buser, T., & Peter, N. (2012). Experimental Economics, 15, pp. 641–655.
Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: multitasking and wellbeing among mothers and fathers in dualearner families. Offer S, & Schneider, B (2011). American Sociological Review, 76(6), pp. 809–833.
A deeper look at gender difference in multitasking: gender-specific mechanism of cognitive control. In Fifth international conference on natural computation (pp.13–17). Washington: IEEE Computer Society.
Gender differences in the relationship between long employment hours and multitasking. Sayer, LC (2007). In BA Rubin (Ed.), Workplace Temporalities (Research in the Sociology of Work) (pp. 403–435). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., Verbruggen F. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136 (4), pp. 601–626.
Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking. Sanbonmatsu D.M., Strayer D.L., Medeiros-Ward N., Watson J.M. (2013) PL oS ONE 8(1): e54402.
Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Eyal Ophir, Clifford Nass, Anthony D. Wagner. PNAS, 15 September, 2009 vol. 106 no. 37, pp. 15583-15587.
Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Jason M. Watson and David L. Strayer. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2010, 17 (4), pp. 479–485.
Distracted driving in elderly and middle-aged drivers. Kelsey R. Thompson et al. Accident Analysis & Prevention. Volume 45, March 2012, pp. 711–717.
Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis.Verhaeghen, Paul; Steitz, David W.; Sliwinski, Martin J.; Cerella, John. Psychology and Aging, Vol. 18(3), Sep, 2003, pp. 443–460.
Distracted driving in elderly and middleaged drivers. Kelsey R. Thompson et al. Accident Analysis & Prevention. Volume 45, March 2012, pp. 711–717.
Deficit in switching between functional brain networks underlies the impact of multitasking on working memory in older adults. Wesley C. Clapp, Michael T. Rubens, Jasdeep Sabharwal, and Adam Gazzaley. PNAS, 26 April, 2011 vol. 108. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/17/7212.full.pdf+html
Training effects on dual-task performance: Are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Bherer, Louis; Kramer, Arthur F.; Peterson, Matthew S.; Colcombe, Stanley; Erickson, Kirk; Becic, Ensar. Psychology and Aging, Vol. 20 (4), Dec. 2005, pp. 695–709. http://www.brams.umontreal.ca/cours/files/PSY-6022A2006/LBherer/Lectures/Bherer%20et%20al_2005.pdf
Интервью в журнале BDW, 11 апреля 2013 г., стр. 6.
Terry Judd, Making sense of multitasking: The role of Facebook, Computers & Education, Volume 70, Jan. 2014, pp. 194–202.
GENERATION M2. Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Victoria J. Rideout, M.A.Ulla G. Foehr, Ph.D .and Donald F. Roberts, Ph.D.A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. JANUARY 2010.
См. также: Teens and mobile phones. Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones.aspx
BMRB International (Бюро исследований британского рынка), исследование ‘Increasing Screen Time [цитируется в “DOES NOT COMPUTE. Screen Technology in Early Years Education”. Aric Sigman. Оригинал не найден.] is Leading to Inactivity of 11-15s’, Youth TGI Study.
An Empirical Examination of the Educational Impact of Text Message-Induced Task Switching in the Classroom: Educational Implications and Strategies to Enhance LearningIn addition. Larry D. Rosen, Alex F. Lim, L. Mark Carrier, and Nancy A. Cheever. Psicologia Educativa. Vol. 17, n. 2, 2011, pp. 163–177.
http://www.oivo.be Denise Van den Broeck 2010.
Getting plugged in: An overview of Internet addiction. Caroline Flisher.
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Volume 46, Issue 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 557–559.
The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: Behavior may shape attitude. Paul Atchley, Stephanie Atwood,Aaron Boulton. Accident Analysis & Prevention. Volume 43, Issue 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 134–142.
College students’ prevalence and perceptions of text messaging while driving. Marissa A. Harrison. Accident Analysis & Prevention. Volume 43, Issue 4, July 2011, pp. 1516–1520.
Adriana Bianchi and Dr. James G. Phillips. CyberPsychology & Behavior. February 2005, 8(1), pp. 39–51.
Digital natives. Sue Bennett. 2012 University of Wollongong Bennett, S. (2012). Digital natives. In Z. Yan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior: Volume 1 (pp. 212–219). United States: IGI Global.
Digital natives: where is the evidence? Helsper, Ellen Johanna, Eynon, Rebecca. British Educational Research Journal. June 2010, Vol. 36 Issue 3, pp. 503–520.
The ‛digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. S Bennett. British journal of educational technology: the journal of the National Council for Educational Technology 2008. 0007-1013. 39(5), pp. 775.
Digital natives: where is the evidence? Helsper, Ellen Johanna, Eynon, Rebecca. British Educational Research Journal. June 2010, Vol. 36 Issue 3, pp. 503–520.
Getting plugged in: An overview of Internet addiction. Caroline Flisher. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Volume 46, Issue 10, October 2010, pp. 557–559.
The effect of multitasking on the grade performance of business students. Y Ellis. Research in Higher Education Journal. 2010. 1941-3432. 8:1 No A 4 U:the relationship between multitasking and academic performance, Computers & Education, Reynol Junco, Shelia R. Cotten, No A 4 U: Volume 59, Issue 2, Sept 2012, pр. 505–514.
Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying, Larry D. Rosen, L. Mark Carrier, Nancy A. Cheever, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 29, Issue 3, May 2013, pp. 948–958,
In-class multitasking and academic performance, Reynol Junco, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 28, Issue 6, Nov. 2012, pp. 2236–2243.
Female College Studentsme 28, Issue 6, Academic Outcomes. Results From a Longitudinal Cohort Study. Jennifer L. Walsh. Robyn L. Fielder. Kate B. Carey. Michael P. Carey. Emerging Adulthood, 26 March 2013.
No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Reynol Juncoa, Shelia R. Cotten. Computers & Education. Volume 59, Issue 2, Sept 2012, pp. 505–514.
The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students. Wade C. Jacobsen, B.S., and Renata Forste, Ph.D. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, BEHAVIOR, AND SOCIAL NETWORKING. Volume 14, Number 5, 2011.
Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying, Larry D. Rosen, L. Mark Carrier, Nancy A. Cheever, Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 29, Issue 3, May 2013, pp. 948–958.
Electronic Media Use, Reading, and Academic Distractibility in College Youth. Laura E. Levine, Ph.D., Bradley M. Waite, Ph.D., And Laura L. Bowman, Ph.D. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. Volume 10, Number 4, 2007.
The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Helene Hembrooke and Geri Gay. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. Volume 15, Number 1, 2003.
In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Carrie B. Fried.Computers & Education. Volume 50, Issue 3, April 2008, pp. 906–914.
Facebook® and academic performance Paul A. Kirschner, Aryn C. Karpinski. Computers in Human Behavior. Volume 26, Issue 6, November 2010, pp. 1237–1245.
Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Reynol Junco. Computers in Human Behavior. Volume 28, Issue 1, Jan 2012, pp. 187–198.
Distracted: Academic Performance Differences Between Teen Users and Non-Users of MySpace and Other Communication Technology. Tamyra A. PIERCE, Roberto VACA, 2000.
The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students. Wade C. Jacobsen, B.S., and Renata Forste, Ph.D. cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking. Volume 14, Number 5, 2011.
Generation M. Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Victoria J. Rideout, M.A.Ulla G. Foehr, Ph.D.and Donald F. Roberts, Ph.D.A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. Jan 2010. http://myweb.wwu.edu/karlberg/444/readings/GenM2.pdf
Electronic Media Use, Reading, and Academic Distractibility in College Youth. Laura E. Levine, Ph.D., Bradley M. Waite, Ph.D., And Laura L. Bowman, Ph.D. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. Volume 10, Number 4, 2007.
Influence of Social Media on the Academic Performance of the Undergraduate Students of Kogi. State University, Anyigba, Nigeria. Ezekiel S. Asemah, Ruth A. Okpanachi, Leo O.N. Edegoh. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 3, No 12 (2013).
The effect of multitasking on the grade performance of business students. Y Ellis, B Daniels, A Jauregui – Research in Higher Education Journal, 2010 — w.aabri.com
Distracted: Academic Performance Differences Between Teen Users and Non-Users of My Space and Other Communication Technology. Tamyra A. Pierce. http://www.iiisci.org/journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/E214BL.pdf
The Laptop and the Lecture: The Effects of Multitasking in Learning Environments. Helene Hembrooke and Geri Gay. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. Fall 2003, Vol. 15 (1).
Laptop und Internet im Hӧrsaal? Wirkungen und Wirkungsmechanismen für evidenzbasierte Lehre. M Spitzer, Nervenheilkunde 32 (2013), 805-812.
Distracted: Academic Performance Differences Between Teen Users and Non-Users of MySpace and Other Communication Technology. Tamyra A. PIERCE. http://www.iiisci.org/journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/E214BL.pdf
Digital Distractions in the Classroom: Student Classroom Use of Digital Devices for Non-Class Related Purposes. Bernard McCoy, Journal of Media Education, October 15, 2013.
Do Action Video Games Improve Perception and Cognition? Walter R. Boot, Daniel P. Blakely, and Daniel J. Simons. Front Psychol. 2011; 2: 226.
Pauline L. Baniqued, Hyunkyu Lee, Michelle W. Voss, Chandramallika Basak, Joshua D. Selling points: What cognitive abilities are tapped by casual video games? Cosman, Shanna DeSouza, Joan Severson, Timothy A. Salthouse, Arthur F. Kramer, Acta Psychologica, Volume 142, Issue 1, January 2013, pp. 74-86.
Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. By Pea, Roy; Nass, Clifford; Meheula, Lyn; Rance, Marcus; Kumar, Aman; Bamford, Holden; Nass, Matthew; Simha, Aneesh; Stillerman, Benjamin; Yang, Steven; Zhou, Michael. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 48(2), Mar 2012, pp. 327–336.
Wasting Time Is New Divide in Digital Era. Matt Richtel. International Herald Tribune. 29 May 2012 (источники не проверены).
Generation M. Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Victoria J. Rideout, M.A.Ulla G. Foehr, Ph.D.and Donald F. Roberts, Ph.D.A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. Jan 2010. http://myweb.wwu.edu/karlberg/444/readings/GenM2.pdf
At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. Отчет министерства здравоохранения Великобритании: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4080984.pdf
The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing, Marieke Longcamp, Marie-Thérèse Zerbato-Poudou, Jean-Luc Velay, Acta Psychologica, Volume 119, Issue 1, May 2005, pp. 67–79.
Contribution de la motricité graphique à la reconnaissance visuelle des lettres, M. Longcamp, A. Lagarrigue, J.-L. Velay, Psychologie Française, Volume 55, Issue 2, June 2010, pp. 181–194.
Handwriting versus Typewriting: Behavioural and Cerebral Consequences in Letter Recognition, Jean-Luc Velay, Marieke Longcamp (2012), Chapter 4.00.07 in Mark Torrance, Denis Аlamargot, Montserrat Castelló, Franck Ganier, Otto Kruse, Anne Mangen, Liliana Tolchinsky, Luuk van Waes (ed.) Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research
The Haptics of Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Explorations of the Impact of Writing Technologies on the Cognitive-Sensorimotor Processes Involved in Writing, Anne Mangen, Jean-Luc Velay (2012), Chapter 4.00.16 in Mark Torrance, Denis Alamargot, Montserrat Castelló, Franck Ganier, Otto Kruse, Anne Mangen, Liliana Tolchinsky, Luuk van Waes (ed.) Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research (Studies in Writing, Volume 25), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 405–407.
Learning through Hand- or Typewriting Influences Visual Recognition of New Graphic Shapes: Behavioral and Functional Imaging Evidence Marieke Longcamp, Céline Boucard, Jean-Claude Gilhodes, Jean-Luc Anton, Muriel Roth, Bruno Nazarian, and Jean-Luc Velay. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. May 2008, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 802–815.
Digitizing Literacy: Reflections on the Haptics of Writing, Advances, Anne Mangen and Jean-Luc Velay (2010). In Haptics, Mehrdad Hosseini Zadeh (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-093-3, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/8710. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advancesin-haptics/digitizing-literacy-reflections-on-the-haptics-of-writing.
The science of Handwriting. Keim, Brandon. Scientific American Mind, Sent/Oct 2013, Vol. 24 Issue 4, pp. 54–59.
Thinking fast and slow. Daniel Kahneman. Penguin Books. 2012. (Канеман Д. Думай медленно, решай быстро. — М.: АСТ, 2013.)
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (in press). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note-taking. Psychological Science.
Your Phone vs. Your Heart. Barbara L. Fredrickson. New York Times: March 23, 2013. Research not yet published at this point.
How attention partitions itself during simultaneous message presentations. Lori Bergen, Tom Grimes and Deborah Potter. Human Communication Research vol. 31 (2005) nr 3, pp. 311.
The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Helene Hembrooke and Geri Gay. Journal of Computing in Higher Education vol. 15 (2003), nr 1, p. 46.
Examining the Affects of Student Multitasking with Laptops during the Lecture. Kraushaar, James M.; Novak, David C. Journal of Information Systems Education, 2010, v21, n 2, pp. 241–251.
Getting plugged in: An overview of Internet addiction. Caroline Flisher. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Volume 46, Issue 10, Oct 2010, pp. 557–559.
Do Learners Really Know Best? Paul A. Kirschner & Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer. Urban Legends in Education. Educational Psychologist. Volume 48, Issue 3, 2013.
Visual voodoo: the biological impact of watching TV. Aric Sigman. Biologist Volume 54 Number 1, Febr 2007. http://aricsigman.com/ IM AGES /VisualVoodoo.pdf
Sedentary Behaviour and Obesity: Review of the Current Scientific Evidence. Stuart Biddle (Chair. The Sedentary Behaviour and Obesity Expert Working Group. UK Department of Health. March 26, 2010.
TVs in the bedrooms of children: Does it impact health and behavior? Susan B. Sissona et al. Preventive Medicine. Volume 52, Issue 2, 1 February 2011, pp. 104–108.
Behavioral Correlates of Television Viewing in Primary School Children. Elif Ӧzmert, Müge Toyran, Kadriye Yurdakӧk, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156; pp. 910–914. http://archpedi.amaassn.org/cgi/content/full/156/9/910
Early Television Exposure and Subsequent Attentional Problems in Children. Pediatrics, 113(4), pp. 708–13. http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/113/4/708.full
Infant Media Exposure and Toddler Development. Suzy Tomopoulos, et al. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2010;164 (12), pp. 1105–1111. http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/164/12/1105
Does watching TV make us happy? Bruno S. Frey. Christine Benesch, Alois Stutzer. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2007. http://www.wwz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/wwz/redaktion/Forum/Publikationen/2007/ Stutzer_TV.pdf
Williams T.M., Joy L.A., Kimball M. The impact of television: natural experiment involving three communities. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1977. [Цитируется в Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc Med. 2002. Оригинал не найден.]
TVs in the bedrooms of children: Does it impact health and behavior? Susan B. Sissona et al. Preventive Medicine. Volume 52, Issue 2, 1 February 2011, pp. 104–108.
Zero to Six: Electronic Media in the Lives of Infants, Toddlers and Preschoolers. http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED482302.pdf
Digital Childhood: Electronic Media and Technology Use Among Infants, Toddlers and Preschoolers. Elizabeth A. Vandewater et al. Pediatrics Vol. 119 No. 5, 1 May 2007. http://www.pediatricsdigest.mobi/content/119/5/e1006.full
Thinking fast and slow. Daniel Kahneman. Pinguin Books. 2012. (Канеман Д. Думай медленно, решай быстро. — М.: АСТ, 2013.)
Dan Ariely. Predictably Irrational, Harper Collins. 2008.
Thinking fast and slow. Daniel Kahneman. Pinguin Books. 2012. (Канеман Д. Думай медленно, решай быстро. — М.: АСТ, 2013.)
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 263–291. http://www.princeton.edu/~kahneman/
docs/Publications/prospect_theory.pdf
Thinking fast and slow. Daniel Kahneman. Pinguin Books. 2012. (Канеман Д. Думай медленно, решай быстро. — М.: АСТ, 2013.)
Dan Ariely. Predictably Irrational, Harper Collins. 2008.
Over breinblinddoeken en ezelsbreinbrugjes die ons brengen waar we niet willen zijn. Theo Compernolle. Marketing Jaarboek, pp. 52–61. Pimms NV. 2011.
Thinking fast and slow. Daniel Kahneman. Pinguin Books. 2012. (Канеман Д. Думай медленно, решай быстро. — М.: АСТ, 2013.)
Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications). Shaul Shalv, Ori Eldar and Yoella Bereby-Meyer. Forthcoming in Psychological Science 2012. http://www.erim.eur.nl/portal/page/portal/
Predictability Modulates Human Brain Response to Reward. Gregory S. Berns, Samuel M. McClure, Giuseppe Pagnoni, and P. Read Montague. The Journal of Neuroscience, 15 April 2001, 21(8), pp. 2793–2798.
Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. K. E. Hsu, F.-Y. Man Ӕ R. A. Gizicki, L. S. Feldman Ӕ. G. M. Fried. Surg Endosc (2008) 22; pp. 196–201.
Habit and Nonhabit Systems for Unconscious and Conscious Behavior: Implications for Multitasking. John Lisman and Eliezer J. Sternberg. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013 25:2, pp. 273–283.
Talks to Teachers on Psychology: And to Students on Some of Lif’’s Ideals. William James (1899) in: Google Books. http://books.google.nl/books?id=w-GNZHwQxEUC&printsec=frontcover&dq
A Critical Review of Habit Learning and the Basal Ganglia. Carol A. Seger and Brian J. Spiering. Front Syst Neurosci. 2011; 5: 66.
Cortical andIk informer nog eens her en der. basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity.Ashby FG, Turner BO, Horvitz JC. Trends Cogn Sci. May, 2010;14(5); pp. 208–215.
Using optogenetics to study habits, Kyle S. Smith, Ann M. Graybiel, Brain Research. Доступно онлайн 10 января 2013, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899313000516
Steve Jobs. The making of Macintosh – An Interview with The Macintosh Design Team (Byte. February, 1984, pp. 60). Копия оригинальной статьи находится здесь: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/09/the-making-of-macintosh-an-interview-with-the-macintosh-design-team/
Conditions for Intuitive Expertise. A Failure to Disagree. Daniel Kahneman and Gary Klein. American Psychologist, Vol. 64(6), September 2009, pp. 515–526.
Conditions for Intuitive Expertise. A Failure to Disagree. Daniel Kahneman and Gary Кlein. American Psychologist, Vol. 64(6), September 2009, pp. 515–526.
The effects of stress and desire for control on superstitious behavior. Keinan, G. (2002). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, pp. 102–108.
Skinner, B.F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, pp. 168–172.
Bijgeloof in de sport. Peter De Wannemaeker. 1984. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Souza, André L., and Cristine H. Legare. “Priming randomness increases the evaluation of ritual efficacy.”
Wright, P., & Erdal, K.J. (2008). Sport superstition as a function of skill level and task difficulty. Journal of Sport Behavior, 31(2), pp. 187–199.
Burger, J., & Lynn, A.L. (2005). Superstitious behaviour among American and Japanese professional baseball players. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), pp. 71–76.
Rudski, J.M., & Edwards, A. (2007). Malinowski goes to college: Factors influencing students’ use of ritual and superstition. The Journal of General Psychology, 134(4), pp. 389–403.
Интересное исследование с хорошим обзором: Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making. Brian C. Gunia, Long Wang, Li Huang, Jiunwen Wang and J. Keith Murnighan. ACAD MANAGE J, February 1, 2012 vol. 55 no. 1, pp. 13–33.
The Morning Morality Effect. The Influence of Time of Day on Unethical Behavior. Maryam Kouchaki. Isaac H. Smith. Psychological Science, October 28, 2013.
Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decision Making. Marko Pitesa. Stefan Thau. Academy of Management Journal. 56, 3 (2013), pp. 635–658. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/81/46/14/PDF/pitesa_thau_amj_2013.pdf
Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making. Brian C. Gunia, Long Wang, Li Huang, Jiunwen Wang and J. Keith Murnighan. ACAD MANAGE J, February 1, 2012 vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 13–33.
Больше об этом читайте в моей небольшой брошюре «Навязчивые руководители» (“Pain in the ass managers”), которую можно бесплатно скачать на моем сайте www.compernolle.com.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/1r9oVtnEhL82LJ ZJJ KpizLmVCfKiqiP25UuSdQn6bTWI/edit?pli=1 или www.compernolle.com — и кликните, чтобы бесплатно скачать текст.
Для обозначения такой «заботливой» конфронтации я придумал термин carefrontation — care (забота) и confrontation (конфронтация). Без заботы о чувствах другого человека конфронтация может легко ранить. Однако чрезмерная чуткость может препятствовать здоровой конфронтации и вести к стагнации.
Over breinblinddoeken en ezelsbreinbrugjes die ons brengen waar we niet willen zijn. Theo Compernolle. Marketing Jaarboek, pp. 52–61. Pimms NV. 2011.
Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ajay Bhaskar Satpute, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Volume 23, Issue 3, June 2013, pp. 361–372.
The brain basis of emotion: a metaanalytic review. K.A. Lindquist, T.D. Wager, H. Kober, E. Bliss-Moreau, L.F. Barrett. Behav Brain Sci, 35 (2012), pp. 121–143.
A functional architecture of the human brain: emerging insights from the science of emotion. K.A. Lindquist, T.D. Wager, H. Kober, E. Bliss-Moreau, L.F. Barrett. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, November 2012, Vol. 16, No. 11 533.
Comment: The Appraising Brain: Towards a Neuro-Cognitive Model of Appraisal Processes in Emotion. Tobias Brosch, David Sander. Emotion Review, April 2013, vol. 5, no. 2, 163–168.
On the Causal Role of Appraisal in Emotion. Agnes Moors. 2013 5: 132 Emotion Review
Identifying Emotions on the Basis of Neural Activation. Kassam K.S., Markey A.R., Cherkassky V.L., Loewenstein G., Just MA. PL oS ONE 8(6): e66032. (2013).
Clarify Brain Affective Processing Without Necessarily Clarifying Emotions. Peter Walla and Jaak Panksepp. Novel Frontiers of Advanced Neuroimaging, 2013, Chapter 6.
On the Causal Role of Appraisal in Emotion. Agnes Moors. Emotion Review, April 2013 vol. 5, no. 2, 132–140 +++.
Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development. Agnes Moors, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, Klaus R. Scherer and Nico H. Frijda. 2013 5: 119.
Emotion Review Neuroscience of affect: brain mechanisms of pleasure and displeasure, Kent C. Berridge, Morten L. Kringelbach, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Volume 23, Issue 3, June 2013, 294–303.
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
Anxiety and Cognitive Performance: Attentional Control Theory, Michael W. Eysenck et al., 7 Emotion 336, 338 (2007).
Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance.Derakshan, Nazanin, and Michael W. Eysenck. European Psychologist 14.2 (2009), 168–176.
Anxiety and Performance: The Disparate Roles of Prefrontal Subregions Under Maintained Psychological Stress. Takizawa, Ryu, et al. Cerebral Cortex (2013).
Portrait of the angry decision maker: how appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Jennifer S. Lerner1, Larissa Z. Tiedens. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Special Issue: The Role of Affect in Decision Making. Volume 19, Issue 2, April 2007, 115–137.
The Mirror Mechanism as Neurophysiological Basis for Action and Intention Understanding. Leonardo Fogassi, Giacomo Rizzolatti. in: Is Science Compatible with Free Will? Suarez, Antoine; Adams, Peter (Eds.) 2013, 117–134. January 2007.
‘Like me’: a foundation for social cognition. Andrew N. Meltzoff. Developmental Science. Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2007, 126–134.
Foundations for a New Science of Learning. Andrew N. Meltzoff, Patricia K. Kuhl, Javier Movellan Terrence J. Sejnowski. Science, 17 July 2009: Vol. 325, no. 5938, 284–288.
Observing complex action sequences: The role of the fronto-parietal mirror neuron system, Istvan Molnar-Szakacs, Jonas Kaplan, Patricia M. Greenfield, Marco Iacoboni, NeuroImage, Volume 33, Issue 3, 15 November 2006, 923–935.
Neural Substrates of Social Emotion Regulation: A fMRI Study on Imitation and Expressive Suppression to Dynamic Facial Signals. Pascal Vrticka, Samanta Simioni, Eleonora Fornari, Myriam Schluep, Patrik Vuilleumier, and David Sander. Front Psychol. 2013; 4: 95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM C3582997/
Getting a grip on other minds: Mirror neurons, intention understanding, and cognitive еmpathy. Jonas T. Kaplan. Social Neuroscience. Volume 1, Issue 3-4, 2006.
The Mirror Mechanism as Neurophysiological Basis for Action and Intention Understanding. Leonardo Fogassi, Giacomo Rizzolatti in: Is Science Compatible with Free Will? Suarez, Antoine; Adams, Peter (Eds.) 2013, 117–134.
Mirror Neurons, Evolution, and Eco-Empathy. Gary Olson. SpringerBriefs in Political Science Volume 10, 2013, pp. 21–30.
How from action-mirroring to intentionascription? Pierre Jacob. Consciousness and Cognition. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810013000287
Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Libet, B. (1985). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 8, 529–539.
On Habit Learning in Neuroscience and Free Will. Javier Bernácer, José Manuel Giménez-Amaya. Chapter 12 in: Is Science Compatible with Free Will? 2013, pp. 177–193.
Does the brain “initiate” freely willed processes? A philosophy of science critique of Libet-type experiments and their interpretation. Hans Radder & Gerben Meynen. Theory Psychology, February 2013 vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3–21.
Много позднее это было все еще принято в некоторых культурах. См. книгу Чарльза Истмена «Мое индейское детство» (М.: Восход, 2013), (“Indian Boyhood” by Charles Eastman).
The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Thomas Friedman; Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005.
Цитата взята из совместного интервью Стива Джобса и членов команды по разработке компьютера Macintosh “The making of Macintosh” (Byte , February 1984, pp. 60). Оригинальное интервью доступно на сайте: http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/09/the-making-of-macintosh-an-interview-withthe-macintosh-design-team/.
A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception,Hanho Jeong, (2012) “Electronic Library, Vol. 30 Iss: 3, pp. 390–408. Reading from an LCD monitor versus paper: Teenagersom an LCD monitor versusnic books and paper booComputers in Human Behavior. Volume 28, Issue 5, September 2012, pp. 1816–1828. http://consortiacademia.org/index.php/ijrset/article/view/170
Taking readingcomprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Rakefet Ackerman, Tirza Lauterman. Computers in Human Behavior. Volume 28, Issue 5, September 2012, pp. 1816–1828.
Usability evaluation of E-books. Yen-Yu Kanga,Mao-Jiun J. Wangb,Rungtai Linc Displays. Volume 30, Issue 2, April 2009, pp. 49–52. Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paperbased reading. Daniel K. Mayes,Valerie K. Sims, Jefferson M. Koonce. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. Volume 28, Issue 6, December 2001, pp. 367–378.
http://www.nea.gov/research/ToRead.pdf
Technology and adolescents: Perspectives on the things to come. Raul L. Katz, Max Felix, Madlen Gubernick. Education and Information Technologies. May 2013. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-013-9258-8#page-2
Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8 to 18-Year-Olds. Rideout, Victoria J.; Foehr, Ulla G.; Roberts, Donald F. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED527859.pdf
Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. David Comer Kidd and Emanuele Castano. Science. 373 (2013).
Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking. Sanbonmatsu D.M., Strayer D.L., Medeiros-Ward N., Watson J.M. (2013), PLoS ONE 8(1): e54402.
Nathan Zeldes, IT Principal Engineer, in a study of 2,300 employees at Intel.
Victor M. González and Gloria Mark Timespace in the workplace: Dealing with interruptions. Proceedings of CHI 95, ACM Press (1995), 262–263.
Basex 2005.
Touch and personality: Extraversion predicts somatosensory brain response, Michael Schaefer, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Michael Rotte, NeuroImage, pp. 432–438.
Do extraverts process social stimuli differently from introverts? Inna Fishman, Rowena Ng, Ursula Bellugi. Cognitive Neuroscience. Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 2011.
Extraversion Is Linked to Volume of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and Amygdala. Cremers H., van Tol M.-J., Roelofs K., Aleman A., Zitman F.G., et al. (2011) PLoS ONE 6 (12).
Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together.Tellegen, Auke; Lykken, David T.; Bouchard, Thomas J.; Wilcox, Kimerly J.; Segal, Nancy L.; Rich, Stephen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54(6), Jun 1988, pp. 1031–1039.
Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (2008). In G. J.Boyle, G.Matthews, & D. H.Saklofske, Handbook of Personality Theory and Testing, Vol. II, Personality Measurement and Assessment (pp. 261–292). Thousand Oaks, CA
Age changes in personality traits and their heritabilities during the adult
years: evidence from Australian twin registry samples, J.C. Loehlin, N.G. Martin, Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 30, Issue 7, May 2001, pp. 1147–1160.
Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Eyal Ophir, Clifford Nass, Anthony D. Wagner. PNAS, September 15, 2009, vol. 106, no. 37, 15583–15587. http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/august24/multitask-researchstudy-082409.html
Personality Processes: Mechanisms by Which Personality Traits “Get Outside the Skin”. Sarah E. Hampson Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 63, 2012, 315–339.
The Moderating Effect of Extraversion–Introversion Differences on Group Idea Generation Performance J. H. Jung, Younghwa Lee, Rex Karsten. Small Group Research, February 2012, vol. 43, no. 1, 30–49.
Would introverts be better off if they acted more like extraverts? Exploring emotional and cognitive consequences of counterdispositional behavior. Zelenski, John M.; Santoro, Maya S.; Whelan, Deanna C. Emotion, Vol. 12(2), Apr 2011.
The Language of Extraversion: Extraverted People Talk More Abstractly, Introverts Are More Concrete. Camiel J. Beukeboom, Martin Tanis, Ivar E. Vermeulen, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, October 5, 2012.
Часть II
Обзор см. на сайте: http://i3pod.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Revisiting-the-Swiss-Cheese-Modek-EECnote-2006-13.pdf
The Promise and Peril of Hyperconnectivity for Organizations and Societies John Fredette, Revital Marom, Kurt Steinert, and Louis Witters (Alcatel-Lucent)
“The Global Information Technology Report” World Economik Forum 2012, Chapter 1.10, p. 113.
Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project . March 19, 2012.
Zo ga je om met je zakelijke smartphone. Marieke van Twillert. Intermediair 10-11-2011. http://www.intermediair.nl/artikel/persberichten/202778/56-ergert-zich-aan-smartphonegebruikcollega.html
Ubiquitous Blackberry: The New Overtime Liability, The; Barbu, Maria L. 5 Liberty U. L. Rev. 47 (2010-2011). Blackberrys and the Fair Labor Standards Act: Does a Wireless Ball and Chain Entitle White-Collar Workers to Overtime Compensation? A M Rothe. Saint Louis University law journal. 54, no. 2, (2010), 709–738.
Ellen Wulfhorst, BlackBerrys, Blogs Create Overtime Work Disputes,USA TODAY, June 25 2008, http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2008-06-25-blackberry-blogs-overtimepay_N.htm
The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface. Brian P. Bailey, Joseph A. Konstan, and John V. Carlis Investigating the effects of computer mediated interruptions: An analysis of task characteristics and interruption frequency on financial performance. K. Asli Basoglu, Mark A. Fuller, John T. Sweeney. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. Volume10, Issue 4, December 2009, pp. 177–189.
Costly Cell Phones: The Impact of Cell Phone Rings on Academic Performance.
Christian M. Enda, Shaye Worthmana, Mary Bridget Mathewsa & Katharina Wetteraua. Teaching of Psychology. Volume 37, Issue 1, 2009.
Entirely irrelevant distractors can capture and captivate attention. Sophie Forster Nilli Lavie. Psychon Bull Rev. December 2011; 18(6), 1064–1070.
Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load. Forster S., Lavie N. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied [2008, 14(1): 73– 83].
Tan, Mark Khai Shean and Richardson, Alex, g6-25-blackberry-blogs-overtimepay_N.htmnegebruAnd Task Complexityi (2011). PACIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 187.
Tan, Mark Khai Shean and Richardson, Alex, “Please Do Not Disturb: Managing Interruptions And Task Complexity” (2011). PACIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 187.
Instant Messaging: Effects of Relevance and Timing. Mary Czerwinski, Edward Cutrell and Eric Horvitz. Microsoft Research. marycz@microsoft.com
Cyber-Serfdom. Thomas L. Friedman. New York Times. January 30, 2001.
Investigating the effects of computer mediated interruptions: An analysis of task characteristics and interruption frequency on financial performance. K. Asli Basoglu, Mark A. Fuller, John T. Sweeney. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. Volume 10, Issue 4, December 2009, pp. 177–18.
Association of Interruptions With an Increased Risk and Severity of Medication Administration Errors. Johanna I. Westbrook, Amanda Woods, Marilyn I. Rob, William T. M. Dunsmuir, Richard O. Day. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(8); 683–690.
The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. Gloria Mark, Daniela Gudith, Ulrich Klocke. CHI ’08 Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. pp. 107–110. ACM New York 2008.
Arthur Schopenhauer: On Noise. 1851, translation by T. Bailey Saunders. http://www.noisehelp.com/schopenhauer-quotes.html. См. также http://www.schopenhauervereinigung.com/articles/arthur-schopenhauer-on-noise/
Conard, Maureen A. and Marsh, Robert M., “Single And Multiple Interruptions Increase Task Performance Time, But Don’t Affect Stress, Pressure or Flow” (2010). WCOB Working Papers. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/wcob_wp/1
Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging. Wesley C. Clapp, Adam Gazzaley. Neurobiology of Aging. Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2012, pp. 134–148.
The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance. Cheri Speier. Decision Sciences. Volume 34, Number 4, 2003.
Juggling on a high wire: Multitasking effects on performance. Rachel F. Adlera, Raquel Benbunan-Fich. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Volume 70, Issue 2, February 2012, pp. 156–168.
Basex 2011.
Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Shai Danzigera, Jonathan Levavb, Liora Avnaim-Pesso. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. April 26, 2011, vol. 108 no. 17 6889–6892.
Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative.Vohs, Kathleen D.; Baumeister, Roy F.; Schmeichel, Brandon J.; Twenge, Jean M.; Nelson, Noelle M.; Tice, Dianne M. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 94(5), May 2008, pp. 883–898.
Self-control: limited resources and extensive benefits. Jessica Alquist, Roy F. Baumeister.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 419–423, May/June 2012.
Motivation, personal beliefs, and limited resources all contribute to self-control. Kathleen D. Vohs, Roy F. Baumeister, Brandon J. Schmeichel Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVolume 48, Issue 4, Jule 2012, pp. 943–947.
Stress and open-office noise. Evans, Gary W.; Johnson, Dana. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85(5), Oct 2000, 779–783.
Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor.
Gailliot, Matthew T.; Baumeister, Roy F.; DeWall, C. Nathan; Maner, Jon K.; Plant, E. Ashby; Tice, Dianne M.; Brewer, Lauren E.; Schmeichel, Brandon J. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 92(2), Feb 2007, 325–336.
Self-Control Without a “Self”? Common Self-Control Processes in Humans and Dogs Holly C. Miller, Kristina F. Pattison, C. Nathan DeWall, Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves and Thomas R. Zentall. Psychological Science, April 2010, vol. 21 no. 4, pp. 534–538.
Cognitive neuroscience of selfregulation failure. Todd F. Heatherton, Dylan D. Wagner, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Volume 15, Issue 3, March 2011, pp. 132–139.
Dietary Restraint Violations Influence Reward Responses in Nucleus Accumbens and Amygdala.
Kathryn E. Demos, William M. Kelley, and Todd F. Heatherton. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. August 2011, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 1952–1963.
The Morning Morality Effect. The Influence of Time of Day on Unethical Behavior. Maryam Kouchaki. Isaac H. Smith. Psychological Science, October 28 2013.
Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Andrew K. Przybylski and Netta Weinstein. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, July 19, 2012.
Emberson L. and Goldstein M., “Overheard Cell-Phone Conversations: When Less Speech is More Distracting,” Psychological Science. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. N. Venetjokia, A. Kaarlela-Tuomaalaa, E. Keskinenb & V. Hongistoa. Ergonomics. Volume 49, Issue 11, 2006.
Indicative research, not very scientific, done amongst clients of the Gazelle trade-in company. Consumers Crave iPhone® More Than Fac